Blog: National Partnership for Action
Research and Health Disparities: Breaking Down Barriers
Posted on 4/10/2013 by Jonca Bull, MD
The prevalence of chronic diseases and conditions is still significantly higher among racial and ethnic minorities; in 2013, minorities continue to live sicker and die younger. Many of us in the research community work each day to find answers to why these disparities persist. Compounding a number of social, environmental and economic challenges, public health historically has not done a good job of including members of minority groups in important research, or advancing knowledge that provides the possible clinical reasons for health disparities.
A key provision of the Affordable Care Act, Section 4302, was designed to strengthen federal data collection and establish standards for collecting and reporting data on race, ethnicity, sex, primary language and disability status. It aims to help researchers, policy makers, health providers and advocates identify, monitor and address health disparities to improve treatment and quality of life.
In my role at FDA and in my previous work as a physician, I have always been committed to addressing health disparities as a dimension of improving the entire health care system. ACA 4302 is an important provision that can have a positive impact on research design and help advance our understanding of health care disparities.
Our mission at FDA is to protect and promote the public's health, serving as both a consumer protection agency and a regulatory agency. We are responsible for ensuring that medical products – drugs, biologics and devices – are safe and effective for their intended use. This includes providing guidance to manufacturers and the review of clinical trial data to ensure that the population included in clinical studies for an investigational product adequately represents the patients likely to be prescribed the product by health care providers. It is critical that careful attention is given to demographic subgroups and health disparities so that the information gathered and analyzed is representative of patients likely to use the product and can be available to inform prescribing decisions if differences are found.
Additionally, FDA provides guidance to product sponsors on diverse representation in research so that any important differences are identified, which may impact safe and effective use. FDA has provided such guidance – Collection of Race and Ethnicity Data in Clinical Trials [PDF | 67KB] – to help medical product sponsors understand and implement current recommendations.
Today, we have an incredible opportunity to move closer to our goal of eliminating racial and ethnic health disparities. What we in the research community must also do is think differently about how we approach inclusion to ensure that racial and ethnic minorities are adequately represented in research at all levels.
To learn more about Minority Health Month and the Affordable Care Act, visit http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov and http://www.healthcare.gov, and join in the conversation @MinorityHealth and @HealthCareGov.
Posted in: Health Community National Minority Health Month | Comments (1) | Add a Comment | Comment Policy | Permalink
I appreciate and applaud Dr.Bull's observation that despite millions of dollars spent on health research in the U.S., health disparities still exist for racial and ethnic minorities. While there are a number of reasons for this, I would like to focus on the fact that one reason for this glaring finding is that minorities are still not included at all phases of the research process. In addition, funding priorities for health research in universities and medical centers where the dollars are invested for the most part very different than health intervention strategies formulated by the community for minority communities. If health research funding were shifted from the major universities and research centers to federally qualified healthcare clinics and community colleges, as examples of organizations who interface with ethnic communities in a major way,per se, then you may be able to see health research restructured and findings implemented in a way to produce better results. At the Institute for Community Research-Dallas, we are modeling collaborations that we believe will produce better results and have better prospects for health equity. Feel free to contact me at email@example.com to learn more.
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.
A field with an asterisk (*) before it is a required field .
About the Blog
The NPA works to achieve health equity -- the highest level of health for all people. This blog is a venue for professionals from all fields and sectors to share their thoughts on pressing issues, news and events pertaining to health equity. Follow and participate in this candid discussion.
About the Author
Jonca Bull, MD, is the first permanent director of FDA's Office of Minority Health. After 12 years in various roles at FDA, she left to work in the private sector and serves as an assistant clinical professor at George Washington University—a post she still holds. She returned to FDA to direct the Office of Minority Health in August 2012.
Recent Blog Posts
→ Our Year in Review: Accomplishments in Women’s Health
→ Making Things Right
→ From Corrections to Affordable Health Care: Empowering Our Returning Community Members
→ The Celebration Continues: Three Kings Day and the Health Insurance Marketplace
→ 2013 Report to Congress on Minority Health Activities
→ Making the Grade: A Report Card for Health Equity
→ Health Atlas for the City of Los Angeles’s Health and Wellness Chapter
→ Changing the Prognosis for Sickle Cell Disease through the Affordable Care Act
→ Winning the battle against health disparities through new technology
→ Improving Data Collection on Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Health